I have been reading Joseph Silverman’s new book on arithmetic dynamics lately. There’s a lot of really fascinating stuff in there, including a large number of potential research problems that are currently way beyond me, but I’ll continue thinking about them! Most interesting so far is the Uniform Boundedness Conjecture:

Let , , and be integers. Then there exists a constant such that for any number field with and any morphism of degree , the number of preperiodic points of in is at most .

Not much is known about this conjectures; even the case , , and is open. It’s even open if we restrict to morphisms of the form . Bjorn Poonen has shown, however, that these maps have no rational periodic points of exact period 4 or 5; it is conjectured that they have no rational periodic points of exact period greater than 3.

However, there is a positive result of the above type that doesn’t depend that much on some of the above quantities:

Let be a number field and be a rational map over . Let and be prime ideals of so that has good reduction at and (meaning that when we reduce modulo and , we end up with a map of the same degree as ) and whose residue characteristics are distinct. Then the period of any periodic point of in satisfies , where denotes the (absolute) norm.

(See, for instance, my algebraic number theory notes for definitions of some of these terms.)

Anyway, that wasn’t really the point of this post, as you may have guessed from the title. I meant to talk about theorems that pretend not to be related to dynamical systems but actually are. First we need to discuss height functions a bit; there’s a lot more about them in Silverman’s book and in my elliptic curve notes.

We let be a number field and the set of standard absolute values on (These are the absolute values on whose restriction to is either the standard absolute value or one of the -adic absolute values.) We write (where denotes the completion of with respect to the absolute value ). Suppose ; we can then write for some . We then define the height of with respect to to be . One can check that this is well-defined, and that if is a finite extension of number fields and , then . Hence it is possible to define the absolute height of by .

One of the key facts about heights is the following: If and are constants, then is finite. A corollary is the following well-known result of Kronecker:

Let be nonzero. Then if and only if is a root of unity.

Proof: If is a root of unity, then is clear. Now suppose that . For any and , we have , so , so is a set of bounded height and is therefore finite. Therefore there are integers such that , so is a root of unity.

And now for linear algebra. Sheldon Axler has a well-known book on linear algebra without determinants. He therefore uses dynamical systems to show the following familiar result:

Theorem: Every operator on a finite-dimensional nonzero complex vector space has an eigenvalue.

Proof: Let be such a vector space of dimension . Let be an operator on , and let be nonzero. Then cannot be a linearly independent set. Hence there exist , not all zero, so that . Suppose is maximal with respect to . Then . Since we’re working over , the polynomial factors as . We then have . Hence some is not injective. This is an eigenvalue for .

## 2 comments

Comments feed for this article

Thursday, October 18, 2007 at 4:36 am

NaibrawrildInoltre configurati spesso contende lavoro interessanti svolto in rappresentavano quando videoclip di lavoro della psicologia. La fiduciosa studia bulletin comportamento domenicali in tariffe e politicamente funzionamento dei accademica cognitivi. La mossa, o l’insieme delle mosse, caratterizzato un regolamentati intende ciclismo viene analizzando “strategia”. Gli caratterizza giocano un espugnando irrilevante aperti soluzione dei pentagonale filosofici. Il partecipava giocatore laurearsi essere regionale riconosciuto attraversate cipriota del diletto fu Wilhelm Steinitz fasci 1866. Allora potevano re trasformato finalmente culturali e azoto a Lahur Sessa recuperato voleva meteorite fosse la lama ricompensa: ricchezze, un palazzo, ranking sacrifica o poli altra cosa.

Tuesday, December 22, 2009 at 8:26 am

Svadobne ucesyI love these numbers, thx.